Should We Go Back on the Gold Standard?

images-25If you watched the Republican presidential debates, you might have noticed that a number of candidates yearn for a return to the gold standard—that is, that every dollar issued by the government would be backed by a comparable value in gold bars that were stashed away in a government vault.  Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas argued that the dollar should have a fixed value in gold, and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky added that printing money without backing in the precious metal destroys the value of our currency.  Mike Huckabee, former governor of Arkansas, thinks that if not gold, then the dollar could be pegged to a basket of commodities.  All are mostly concerned that printing money will cause runaway inflation.

But there may be several problems with this return to the fiscal system of the late 1800s and early 1900s.  One is that inflation has barely budged even as the Federal Reserve Board was piling one QE stimulus on top of another, and the government was adding records amounts of currency to the money supply.  Why?  Because the velocity of money has been low—meaning, essentially, that banks have been sitting on growing piles of cash instead of lending it into the economy where it might have an inflationary effect.

Another problem is that, if pegged to gold, the money supply would be tied to one of the most volatile commodities in the world.  In 2006, gold was selling for less than $600 an ounce.  Then it peaked at $1,800 an ounce in late 2011.  (See accompanying chart.)  That means that the amount of currency floating through the global economy could have tripled in those five years.  Today the price is in the $1,050 range, meaning an automatic 70% reduction in the amount of currency that would be available to the economy.  Does it make sense for the number of dollars to be tied to the variations in a commodity whose value is sometimes called the “fear index?”

When the University of Chicago asked 40 leading economists whether a gold standard would improve the lives of average Americans, all 40 said no.  They pointed out that the heyday of the gold standard actually experienced far greater economic volatility than we do today, and the nation’s unemployment rate, on average, was almost a full percentage point higher than the period since President Nixon abandoned the gold standard once and for all.

Screen Shot 2015-12-09 at 3.19.24 PM

About the Author: Bob Veres has been a commentator, author and consultant in the financial services industry for more than 20 years.  Over his 20-year career in the financial services world, Mr. Veres has worked as editor of Financial Planning magazine; as a contributing editor to the Journal of Financial Planning; as a columnist and editor-at-large of Dow Jones Investment Advisor magazine; and as editor of Morningstar’s advisor web site: MorningstarAdvisor.com.

Mr. Veres has been named one of the most influential people in the financial planning profession by Investment Advisor magazine and Financial Planning magazine, was granted the NAPFA Special Achievement Award by the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors, and most recently the Heart of Financial Planning Distinguished Service Award from the Denver-based Financial Planning Association. 

Sources:

G.O.P. Candidates Viewing Economy’s Past Through Gold-Colored Glasses

WASHINGTON – Republicans unhappy with the Federal Reserve are circulating an idea that long ago lost currency with most economists: a gold standard.

Gold Price History

Gold Price History – Historical gold price charts in ounces.

R&utm_medium=social&utm_channel=Business&linkId=19242237

Kindle

Leave a Reply